Brickwork Ratings
spacer  
 
flashtext
   

Securities and Exchange Board of India licensed credit rating agency

 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
star Rating Services
star Ratings Policy
star Ratings Process
star Ratings Criteria
 
star Large Corporate
star Finance Sector
star Infrastructure Sector
star Commercial Paper
star SME
star State Governments
star Corporate Governance
star Rating Committees
 
star External Rating Committee
star Internal Rating Committee
star Rating Criteria Committee
star Rating Scale
star Rating List
star Disclosures
spacer
Brickwork Ratings – General Criteria
spacer

The criteria document identifies and briefly addresses some of the specific factors considered by Brickwork Ratings in analysing a Credit Rating. Credit rating criteria enable analysts to analyze and interpret information on a consistent approach. At Brickwork, we refine rating criteria and benchmarks proactively, taking into account changes in the market environment. Robust criteria assist in accurate assessment of credit risk for an entity. Ratings are subjective credit opinions based on various qualitative and quantitative factors; the robustness of ratings is preserved through consistent application of updated rating criteria.

Distinguishing companies by business classification:
At Brickwork, we have broadly classified the debt issuer segments as: a) Manufacturing sector b) Financial sector c) Infrastructure sector and d) Government & Local bodies. Within each of the segment, there could be further classifications. For e.g.: Financial sector may include Banks, Insurance companies, Mutual Funds, NBFCs’, Micro-finance institutions and so on.

Distinguishing Issuer & Issue
Brickwork Ratings assigns two types of credit ratings: one to issuers and the other to specific debt issues or other financial obligations. The first type is called a ‘Brickwork's counterparty credit rating’. It is a current opinion of an issuer's overall capacity to pay its financial obligations-that is, its fundamental creditworthiness. This opinion focuses on the issuer's ability and willingness to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis. It does not reflect any priority or preference among obligations. "Default rating" and "issuer credit rating" are additional ways of referring to this type of rating. Generally a counterparty credit rating is published for all companies that have issue ratings, in addition to those firms that have no rateable issues, but request an issuer counterparty rating. Credit ratings are also assigned to specific issues. In fact, the vast majority of credit ratings pertain to specific debt issues. The junior debt may be rated below the counterparty credit rating, while well-secured debt can be rated above.

You may observe, since we have adopted the probability of default approach for rating, most of the cases, the issuer rating and issue rating will be the same.

Distinguishing Long-term & Short-term Ratings
Long-term ratings are forward-looking assessments over a two to three year credit horizon, designed to remain stable over the course of normal business cycles. They range from ‘BWR AAA' for the highest quality obligations to 'BWR D' for the lowest. Ratings from 'BWR AA' to 'BWR C' may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to distinguish relative credit standing within the major rating categories.

Short-term ratings evaluate the likelihood of a borrower's timely repayment of obligations considered short-term in relevant markets. This definition covers any obligation with an original maturity of one year or less, such as commercial paper. They range from 'BWR P1' for the highest quality obligations to 'BWR P5' for the lowest and the details could be seen in the ratings scale document. Brickwork uses modifiers for P1 to P3.

Distinguishing Individual Vs Structured Ratings
The criteria for rating an individual issuer / issue are different as compared to rating of a pool for a structured product and the same may be observed in the attachments.

Distinguishing Solicited Vs Unsolicited Ratings
The major distinction between an unsolicited and a solicited rating is that the latter is requested and therefore paid for by the rated firm while the former is neither of the two. Consequently, unsolicited ratings are based on publicly available information only and also based on the internal research on industry and peer group.

The credit rating symbol for an unsolicited rating is accompanied by the word UNSOLICITED in bold letters to differentiate from the solicited ratings.

Common thread across all ratings
At Brickwork Ratings, we use a common thread for rating all Issuers or Issues, Long-term or Short-term, Solicited or Unsolicited and Individual or a pool of assets. Such a common thread consists of broad factors - business risk, industry risk, management risk and financial risk. Each of this broad risk factor will have a list of parameters and these parameters may be different for different types of segments.

In this document, the broad risk factors are discussed and the discussion on parameter is included in the segment-wise criteria.

A) Business Risk:
Each credit rating analysis begins with an assessment of the company's environment. To determine the degree of operating risk facing a company in a given business, Brickwork analyses the dynamics of business. Factors assessed include the prospects for growth, stability, or decline, and the pattern of business cycles. It is critical to determine vulnerability to technological change, labour unrest, or the impact of government intervention. Industries that have long lead times in building production capacity or that require fixed plant of a specialised nature face heightened risk. The implications of increasing competition are obviously crucial.

B) Industry Risk:
The purpose of industry analysis is to understand the conditions in which a business operates and the changes - cyclical, competitive, and technological - that it is likely to experience. Most industries exhibit some degree of cyclical volatility and some industries are exposed to seasonal variances, too. Such volatility affects the operating performance and financial condition of a company. Technological change and new competitors or substitute products can also affect performance.

Industry risks can influence the credit rating of any company or entity in the industry. Brickwork Ratings assigns lower ratings to companies with extensive participation in industries of above-average risk, regardless of how conservative their financial postures. However, Brickwork's methodology emphasises the business position of the company being rated in addition to a generic risk profile for the industry in which it operates.

C) Management Risk:
The importance of a management - competency and integrity - can not be overstated. The ability of the commercial entity’s managers to guide it, exploit opportunities, develop and execute plans, and react to market changes is extremely important to its financial well being. The unexpected loss of one or two key employees can be detrimental to a company, particularly a small or mid-size firm. Even the most experienced management teams can be challenged by high growth, which is one of the most common reasons for business failure. We consider the risk appetite of the company and as well evaluate its corporate governance principles.

D) Financial Risk:
At Brickwork, we believe that there is no substitute for rigorous analysis of financial statements. The balance sheet, income statement, sources and uses of funds statement, and financial projections provide essential information about the company’s initial and ongoing repayment capacity. Quantitative analysis of revenues, profit margins, income and cash flow, leverage, liquidity, and capitalization should be sufficiently detailed to identify trends and anomalies that may affect borrower performance. Financial risk is portrayed largely through quantitative means, particularly by using financial ratios. Benchmarks vary greatly by industry, and several analytical adjustments typically are required to calculate ratios for an individual company.
Analysis of the audited financials begins with a review of accounting quality. The purpose is to determine whether ratios and statistics derived from financial statements can be used accurately to measure a company's performance and position relative to its peer group. Some of the issues reviewed include the basis of consolidation, income recognition, depreciation methods, capitalized interest and off-balance sheet liabilities. To the extent possible, analytical adjustments are made to better portray reality.
The balance sheet deserves as much attention as the income statement. The balance sheet can provide an early warning of credit problems, for example, if assets degrade or the relative level of assets and liabilities changes. Commercial borrowers generate their revenue, income, and liquidity from their assets, so examiners should analyze the composition of these accounts and how their proportions change. Capitalization and liquidity also warrant careful analysis because they imply a borrower’s ability to withstand an economic slowdown or unplanned events.

Cash Flow
Business cash flow is the operating revenue derived from ordinary business activities less operating costs paid (not simply incurred), plus noncash expenses such as depreciation and amortization. Although the concept is simple, cash flow calculations are often complex. Many businesses calculate cash flow differently because of the nature of their operations and cash conversion cycle.

Changes in “working capital” accounts are reviewed to understand the cash flow implications. Uses of cash flow are scrutinized — debt repayment is not the only use of cash flow. Changes, actual or planned, in capital expenditures must be closely reviewed. A troubled borrower will often cut capital expenditures in order to generate cash for debt service. Although this may provide short-term relief, such reductions can imperil a business’s future. Shortfalls in cash flow or debt service coverage are usually the most obvious indications of a weak credit quality.

Ratio Analysis and Benchmarks
Financial ratios provide vital information about balance sheet and income statement proportions (debt to equity, income to revenues, etc.). Comparing a borrower’s financial ratios with prior periods and industry or peer group norms can identify potential weaknesses. Whenever a ratio deviates significantly from that of its peers, examiners should conduct further analysis to identify the root cause.

Analysis of Projections
While current and historical information is necessary to establish a company’s condition and financial track record, projections estimate expected performance. The Analyst examines how projections vary from historical performance and assess whether the borrower is likely to achieve them. Projections are generally analyzed under multiple scenarios — downside, breakeven, best case, most likely case — and stress-tested periodically. The companies who quickly or repeatedly fall short of their projections lack credibility and factored in rating.



A rating of a subsidiary, or an affiliate that is controlled by a dominant shareholder, involves an examination of its parent company's credit quality, which could enhance or detract from the subsidiary or affiliate's stand-alone rating. If parental links are weak, the issuer is likely to be rated more on a stand-alone basis.

Segment-wise criteria documents have been described separately.

spacer
© -2008 Brickwork Ratings . All rights reserved.
Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
spacer
© -2008 Brickwork Ratings . All rights reserved.